Previous Page  18 / 80 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 80 Next Page
Page Background

18

christian counseling today

VOL. 22 NO. 1

The human libido is not a hardwired biological urge, but

one that can be changed by our behaviors and experiences.

Sexual tastes can be acquired. Our brains were created to

respond to sexual stimulation in a specific way. During a

sexual encounter, the neurotransmitter, dopamine, is released,

leading to a sharpened sense of focus and sexual craving.

Dopamine is responsible for giving us a thrill when we

accomplish something as it connects neurons in the brain.

Dopamine also plays a central role in addiction, where it

is triggered without the goal accomplishment, a change that is

of concern. Pornography alters this reward system and brings

a compulsion to seek out the activity in order to trigger the

dopamine discharge. The release of dopamine helps reinforce

the memory of the experience so the brain remembers where

to return for the next encounter.

Behaviors like pornography use reinforce the reward,

motivation, and memory circuits of the brain that are part

of any addiction.

1

The thrill of the dopamine surge while

viewing pornography consolidates neural connections.

Because of the similarity to other addictions, the American

Society of Addiction Medicine expanded their definition

of addictions to include both behaviors and substances.

Pornography is included on that list because of the

dysfunction to brain circuitry that leads to biological,

psychological, social, and spiritual manifestations.

Dr. Valerie Voon, a neuropsychiatrist at the University of

Cambridge, is one of many researchers exploring the question

of pornography classification. Using brain scans, Voon

studied whether subjects who viewed pornography showed

the same brain activity as substance users. In the 2013 British

documentary, “Porn on the Brain,” she concluded that the

brain activity of habitual pornography users looks the same

as those of alcoholics, but was quick to add that more studies

were needed before we could classify pornography use as

addictive.

Not everyone agrees that those who regularly use

pornography are truly addicted in the classical sense of the

definition. Research neuroscientists at UCLA published a

study in

Biological Psychology

concluding the opposite—that

the activity of the brain on porn looks different than other

addictions and should be treated differently. What they

observed, using brain wave monitoring (EEG), was decreased

brain activity when viewing porn—the opposite of what drug

addiction does to the brain, at least in terms of this electrical

impulse measure.

2

However, their findings are problematic

in that the study lacked a clear hypothesis in terms of which

addiction model was being tested.

In a landmark paper written by Dr. Eric Nestler

(2005), Chairman of the Department of Neuroscience and

Director of the Friedman Brain Institute at the Mount Sinai

Medical Center in New York, he describes any addiction

as a dysfunction of the mesolimbic reward center of the