Christian Psychology
18
Bishop, R. C. (2009). What is this naturalism stuff
all about?
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical
Psychology, 29,
108-113.
Brooke, J. H. (1991).
Science and religion: Some histori-
cal perspectives.
New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Byl, J. (2002). Naturalism, theism, and objective
knowledge.
Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 14
,
69-90.
Cassibba, R., Granqvist, P., Costantini, A., & Gatto,
S. (2008). Attachment and god representations
among lay Catholics, priests, and religious: A
matched comparison study based on the adult at-
tachment interview.
Developmental Psychology, 44,
1753-1763.
Clark, T. W. (1993). Faith, science, and the soul: On
the pragmatic virtues of naturalism.
The Humanist,
53
, 7.
Craig, W. L., & Moreland, J. P. (2000). Naturalism:
A
critical analysis.
New York: Routledge.
Daston, L. J., & Galison, P. (2010).
Objectivity.
Brooklyn: Zone Books.
Dixon, T. (2008).
Science and religion: A very short
introduction.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Evans, A. N., & Rooney, B. J. (2010).
Methods in psy-
chological research
(2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Fincham, F. D., Lambert, N. M., & Beach, S. R. H.
(2010) Faith and unfaithfulness: Can praying for
your partner reduce infidelity?
Journal of Personal-
ity and Social Psychology, 99
, 649-659.
Fishman, D. B. (1999).
The case for pragmatic psychology.
New York: New York University Press.
Forrest, B. (2000). Methodological naturalism and
philosophical naturalism: Clarifying the connec-
tion.
Philo, 3
, 7-29.
Foster, R. J. (1992).
Prayer: Finding the heart’s true
home.
New York: HarperCollins.
Gadamer, H. G. (1997).
Truth and Method.
New York:
Continuum.
Gasser, G. (2007).
How successful is naturalism?
Piscat-
away, NJ: Transaction Books.
Geisler, N. L. (2011).
Systematic theology: In one vol-
ume.
Minneapolis: Bethany House.
Gorsuch, R. L. (2002). The Pyramids of Sciences and
of Humanities: Implications for the Search for
Religious “Truth.”
American Behavioral Scientist,
45
, 1822–1838.
Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria.
Natu-
ral History, 106
, 16-22.
Granqvist, P., Ivarsson, T., Broberg, A. G., & Hagekull,
B. (2007). Examining relations among attachment,
religiosity, and new age spirituality using the Adult
Attachment Interview.
Developmental Psychology,
43
, 590 – 601.
Gravetter, F. J. & Forzano, L. B. (2012).
Research Meth-
ods for the Behavioral Sciences
(4th Ed.). Belmont,
CA: Wadsworth.
Greiffenhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2008). Where do
the limits of experience lie? Abandoning the dual-
ism of objectivity and subjectivity.
History of the
Human Sciences, 21
, 70-93.
Griffin, D. R. (2000).
Religion and scientific natural-
ism: Overcoming the conflicts.
Albany, NY: SUNY
Press.
Griffin, D. R. (2004).
Two great truths: A new synthesis
of scientific naturalism and Christian faith.
Louis-
ville, KY: Westminister John Knox Press.
Hannam, J. (2011).
The genesis of modern science: How
the Christian middle ages launched the scientific revo-
lution.
Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
Heidegger, M. (1962).
Being and Time
(trans. J. Mac-
quarie & E. Robinson). New York: Harper and
Row Press.
Heiman, G. W. (1999).
Understanding research methods
and statistics: An integrated introduction
(2nd Ed.).
New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Held, B. S. (2007).
The interpretive turn: The search for
truth and agency in theoretical and philosophical
psychology.
Washington, DC: American Psychologi-
cal Association.
Helminiak, D. A. (2001). Response and clarifications
on “Treating spiritual issues in secular psychothera-
py.”
Counseling and Values, 45,
237-251.
Helminiak, D. (2008). Confounding the divine and
the spiritual: Challenges to a psychology of spiritu-
ality.
Pastoral Psychology, 57
, 161-182.
Helminiak, D. A. (2010). “Theistic psychology and
psychotherapy”: A theological and scientific cri-
tique.
Zygon, 45
, 47-74.
Helminiak, D. A., Hoffman, L., & Dodson, E. (2012).
A critique of the “Theistic Psychology” movement
as exemplified in Bartz’s (2009) “Theistic Existen-
tial Psychotherapy.”
The Humanistic Psychologist,
40,
179-196.
Hibberd, F. J. (2009). Sham reasoning, humpty
dumpty, and the burden of proof.
Journal of Theo-
retical and Philosophical Psychology, 29
, 91-96.
Hibberd, F. J. (2012). Scientific theism: Where the
force of logic is denied its force.
Research in the
Social Scientific Study of Religion, 2
3, 107-120.
Hume, D. (1739/2011). A treatise of human nature.
In D. Norton & M. Norton (Eds.),
The Claren-
don edition of the works of David Hume: A treatise
of human nature
(vol. 1; pp. 1-402). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1777/2007).
An enquiry concerning human
understanding.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, S. L. (2012).
Research methods and statistics: A
critical thinking approach
(4th ed.). Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Johnson, E. (2007). Towards a philosophy of science
for Christian psychology.
Edification: Journal of the
Society for Christian Psychology
,
1,
5-20.
THEISTIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE RELATION OF WORLDVIEWS
