Christian Psychology
19
Larmer, R. A. (2012). Psychology, theism, and method-
ological naturalism.
Research in the Social Scientific
Study of Religion, 23
, 135-149.
Leahey, T. H. (1991).
A history of modern psychology.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Looy, H. (2005). The body of faith: Genetic and
evolutionary considerations.
Journal of Psychology
and Christianity, 24,
113-121.
Messer, S. B., Sass, L. A., & Woolfolk, R. L. (1988).
Hermeneutics and psychological theory: Interpre-
tive perspectives on personality, psychotherapy, and
psychopathology.
New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University Press.
Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2007).
Research Design
Explained
(6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson
Wadsorth.
Mootz, F. J. (2010).
Law, hermeneutics, and rhetoric.
Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Müller, H. F. J. (2010).
Brain in mind: Ontology be-
comes pragmatic design in the unstructured.
Bloom-
ington, IN: iUniverse.
Naugle, D. K. (2002).
Worldview: The history of a
concept.
Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans.
Nelson, J. M. (2005). Missed opportunities in dialog
between psychology and religion.
Journal of Psy-
chology and Theology, 34,
205-216.
Nelson, J. M. (2009).
Psychology, religion, and spiritual-
ity.
New York: Springer.
Nelson, L. (1999). Personal Communication.
Okasha, S. (2002).
Philosophy of science: A very short
introduction.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Osterlund, C., & Carlile, P. (2005). Relations in
practice: Sorting through practice theories of
knowledge sharing in complex organizations.
The
Information Society, 21,
91–107.
Packer, M. J., & Addison, R. B. (1989).
Entering the
circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology.
Albany: SUNY Press.
Piedmont, R. L. (2008). Welcome.
Psychology of Reli-
gion and Spirituality, 1,
1-2.
Plantinga, A. (2010). Naturalism, theism, obligation,
and supervenience.
Faith and Philosophy, 27,
247-
272.
Plantinga, A. (2011).
Where the Conflict Really Lies: Sci-
ence, Religion, and Naturalism.
New York: Oxford
University Press.
Popper, K. (2002).
The logic of scientific discovery.
New
York: Taylor and Francis.
Rea, M. C. (2007). How successful is naturalism? In G.
Gasser (Ed.),
How successful is naturalism?
(pp. 105-
116). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Books.
Reber, J. S. (2000). Privileging hedonism: Confounds
and consequences.
The General Psychologist, 35,
80-82.
Reber, J. S. (2006a). Secular psychology: What’s the
problem?
Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34,
193–204.
Reber, J. S. (2006b). Response to Cooper and Brown-
ing’s commentary.
Journal of Psychology and Theol-
ogy, 34
, 272-275.
Reber, J. S., Slife, B. D., & Downs, S. D. (2012). A
tale of two theistic studies: Illustrations and evalu-
ation of a potential program of theistic psychologi-
cal research.
Research in the Social Scientific Study of
Religion, 23
, 191-212.
Reber, J. S., Slife, B. D., & Sanders, P. (2012). A
pluralistic psychology? Only if difference makes
a difference.
Edification: Journal of the Society for
Christian Psychology, 5
, 108-112.
Richardson, F. C. (2009). Biases against theism in
psychology?
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical
Psychology, 29,
122-127.
Richardson, F. C., Fowers, B. J., & Guignon, C. B.
(1999).
Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimen-
sions of theory and practice.
San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the Human Sci-
ences, Cambridge University Press.
Rouse, J. (2002).
How Scientific Practices Matter:
Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Runciman, W. G. (2002).
The origin of human social
institutions (Proceedings of the British Academy).
New York: Oxford University Press.
Rye, M. S., Pargament, K. I., Ali, M. A., Beck, G.
L., Dorff, E. N., Hallisey, C., Narayanan, V., &
Williams, J. G. (2000). Religious perspectives
on forgiveness. In M. McCullough, K. Parga-
ment, and C. Thoreson (Eds.),
Forgiveness: Theory,
research, and practice
(pp. 17-40). New York: The
Guilford Press.
Schafersman, S. D. (1997). Naturalism is an essential
part of science and critical inquiry. Paper pre-
sented at the Conference on naturalism, theism,
and the scientific enterprise, Austin, TX. Retrieved
January 3, 2013 from cybercomputing.com/freein-
quiry/files/naturalism.html
Schweigert, W. A. (2012).
Research methods in psy-
chology: A handbook
(3rd Ed.) Long Grove, IL:
Waveland Press.
Searle, J. R. (2004).
Mind: A brief introduction.
New
York: Oxford University Press.
Slife, B. D. (2004). Theoretical challenges to therapy
practice and research: The constraint of natural-
ism. In M. Lambert (Ed.)
Handbook of psycho-
therapy and behavior change
(pp. 44 – 83). New
York: Wiley.
Slife, B. D., & Christensen, T. (in press). Hermeneutic
realism: Toward a truly meaningful psychology.
Review of General Psychology.
Slife, B. D., & Melling, B. S. (2006. Psychological
method and the activity of god: Clarifications and
distinctions.
Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34,
280-284.
REBER AND SLIFE
